Secrecy Pandemic

The controversy encircling Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her use of private email to conduct public business provides our latest example of government in the shadows, a situation we know well in South Carolina.

The idea that electronic communication of public business should be stored and made available to the public similarly to printed communication is not new. Compliance remains another matter.

Mrs. Clinton called her use of private email “a matter of convenience.” She said she turned over all relevant emails to the State Department which will review them and later publish them online. Worth noting is that the nonpartisan Committee for Effective Government has rated the State Department last among major agencies in processing FOI requests, once taking as long as six years to comply with a request.

Here in South Carolina, our examples of shadow government range from the governor’s office to the smallest town’s elected officials.

Decisions about budgets, taxes, school and road openings and closings, hirings and firings, you name it – public officials who discuss these and other issues via private channels prevent citizens and the press from participating in the process and overseeing the actions of those who represent us.

Under the S.C. Freedom of Information Act, public bodies are required to turn over all public records in their possession. The law says public records include documentary materials “regardless of physical form or characteristics.” When the law was adopted in 1976, developing technology couldn’t be specifically included because, of course, it didn’t exist. But the qualifying phrase, “regardless of physical form or characteristics,” applies.

Sadly, South Carolina’s email retention laws are confusing and inconsistently enforced, resulting in blurred lines between public communication and private. This has resulted in the loss of important correspondence never made available as public records and also documents inadvertently deleted from state servers.

Bills under consideration right now in Columbia include one that would designate an office of FOI review, making it easier for citizens and journalists to use FOI tools without costly legal bills; and another that would require an agenda for public meetings, thus negating a state Supreme Court decision last year which seriously weakened public notice of government intentions.

Rep. Weston Newton (R-Beaufort), a sponsor of the bills in the House, said that our state has a culture developed around the idea that decisions are made by a select few and everyone else hears about it afterward.

And even if we hear about it afterward, we might never know the twists and turns, compromises and promises, intentions planned and unintended, if the discussions along the way are not open and available.

Making government transparency as ubiquitous as email would seem so easy to accomplish. Compliance is what we need.

As we focus on open government during Sunshine Week, your right to know is never more important.

Trisha O’Connor is the chair of the South Carolina Press Association’s FOI Committee and media executive in residence at Coastal Carolina University where she teaches journalism.